Conservative Thought and American Constitutionalism since the New Deal

Conservative Thought and American Constitutionalism since the New Deal
Author :
Publisher : JHU Press
Total Pages : 398
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9781421444635
ISBN-13 : 1421444631
Rating : 4/5 (631 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Conservative Thought and American Constitutionalism since the New Deal by : Johnathan O'Neill

Download or read book Conservative Thought and American Constitutionalism since the New Deal written by Johnathan O'Neill and published by JHU Press. This book was released on 2022-11-29 with total page 398 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: An intellectual history of American conservativism since the New Deal. The New Deal fundamentally changed the institutions of American constitutional government and, in turn, the relationship of Americans to their government. Johnathan O'Neill's Conservative Thought and American Constitutionalism since the New Deal examines how various types of conservative thinkers responded to this significant turning point in the second half of the twentieth century. O'Neill identifies four fundamental transformations engendered by the New Deal: the rise of the administrative state, the erosion of federalism, the ascendance of the modern presidency, and the development of modern judicial review. He then considers how various schools of conservative thought (traditionalists, neoconservatives, libertarians, Straussians) responded to these major changes in American politics and culture. Conservatives frequently argued among themselves, and their responses to the New Deal ranged from adaptation to condemnation to political mobilization. Ultimately, the New Deal pulled American governance and society permanently leftward. Although some of the New Deal's liberal gains have been eroded, a true conservative counterrevolution was never, O'Neill argues, a realistic possibility. He concludes with a plea for conservative thinkers to seriously reconsider the role of Congress—a body that is relatively ignored by conservative intellectuals in favor of the courts and the presidency—in America's constitutional order. Conservative Thought and American Constitutionalism since the New Deal explores the scope and significance of conservative constitutional analysis amid the broader field of American political thought.


Conservative Thought and American Constitutionalism since the New Deal Related Books

Conservative Thought and American Constitutionalism since the New Deal
Language: en
Pages: 398
Authors: Johnathan O'Neill
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2022-11-29 - Publisher: JHU Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

An intellectual history of American conservativism since the New Deal. The New Deal fundamentally changed the institutions of American constitutional government
Originalism in American Law and Politics
Language: en
Pages: 308
Authors: Johnathan O'Neill
Categories: History
Type: BOOK - Published: 2005-07-12 - Publisher: JHU Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book explains how the debate over originalism emerged from the interaction of constitutional theory, U.S. Supreme Court decisions, and American political d
American Conservatism, 1900-1930
Language: en
Pages: 322
Authors: Joseph Postell
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2019-10-04 - Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book presents the most significant speeches and writings of American constitutional conservatives during the period 1900-1930. Figures such as William Howa
Common-law Liberty
Language: en
Pages: 230
Authors: James Reist Stoner
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2003 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In an ere as morally confused as ours, Stoner argues, we at least ought to know what we've abandoned or suppressed in the name of judicial activism and the mode
The Most Activist Supreme Court in History
Language: en
Pages: 394
Authors: Thomas M. Keck
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2010-02-15 - Publisher: University of Chicago Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

When conservatives took control of the federal judiciary in the 1980s, it was widely assumed that they would reverse the landmark rights-protecting precedents s