Article III Standing
Author | : LandMark Publications |
Publisher | : |
Total Pages | : 538 |
Release | : 2018-02-12 |
ISBN-10 | : 1980270023 |
ISBN-13 | : 9781980270027 |
Rating | : 4/5 (027 Downloads) |
Download or read book Article III Standing written by LandMark Publications and published by . This book was released on 2018-02-12 with total page 538 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: THIS CASEBOOK contains a selection of U. S. Court of Appeals decisions that analyze, interpret and apply the doctrine of Article III standing.Even if there is a case -- a lawsuit -- it is not justiciable under federal law unless the plaintiff has a "concrete" interest in prevailing in the case, for such an interest is the sine qua non of "standing to sue." Gubala v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., 846 F. 3d 909 (7th Cir. 2017).Article III, section 2 of the Constitution allows federal courts to consider only "Cases" and "Controversies." Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497, 516, 127 S.Ct. 1438, 167 L.Ed.2d 248 (2007). "Those two words confine 'the business of federal courts to questions presented in an adversary context and in a form historically viewed as capable of resolution through the judicial process.'" Id. (quoting Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83, 95, 88 S.Ct. 1942, 20 L.Ed.2d 947 (1968)). "Standing is an essential and unchanging part of the case-or-controversy requirement" and is therefore a prerequisite to our jurisdiction. See Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992). The "gist of the question of standing" is whether the plaintiff has a sufficiently "personal stake in the outcome of the controversy" to ensure that the parties will be truly adverse and their legal presentations sharpened. Massachusetts, 549 U.S. at 517, 127 S.Ct. 1438 (quoting Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 204, 82 S.Ct. 691, 7 L.Ed.2d 663 (1962)). Washington v. Trump, 847 F. 3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2017). To establish Article III standing, a plaintiff must demonstrate "that it has suffered a concrete and particularized injury that is either actual or imminent, that the injury is fairly traceable to the defendant, and that it is likely that a favorable decision will redress that injury." Id. (citing Lujan, 504 U.S. at 560-61, 112 S.Ct. 2130). Washington v. Trump, ibid.