The Theory of Social Economy

The Theory of Social Economy
Author :
Publisher :
Total Pages : 728
Release :
ISBN-10 : MINN:31951001972526O
ISBN-13 :
Rating : 4/5 ( Downloads)

Book Synopsis The Theory of Social Economy by : Gustav Cassel

Download or read book The Theory of Social Economy written by Gustav Cassel and published by . This book was released on 1967 with total page 728 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:


The Theory of Social Economy Related Books

The Theory of Social Economy
Language: en
Pages: 728
Authors: Gustav Cassel
Categories: Business & Economics
Type: BOOK - Published: 1967 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The Theory Of Social And Economic Organization
Language: en
Pages: 326
Authors: Max Weber
Categories: Social Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2009-11-24 - Publisher: Simon and Schuster

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book is an introduction to Max Weber’s ambitious comparative study of the sociological and institutional foundations of the modern economic and social or
The Social Economy
Language: en
Pages: 270
Authors: Antonella Noya
Categories: Globalization
Type: BOOK - Published: 2007 - Publisher:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Social economy -- also known as "non-profit" or "third sector" -- organizations have grown in number and relevance, contributing to employment, social inclusion
Economics as a Social Science
Language: en
Pages: 233
Authors: Andrew M. Kamarck
Categories: Business & Economics
Type: BOOK - Published: 2009-04-21 - Publisher: University of Michigan Press

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Economics as a Social Science is a highly readable critique of economic theory, based on a wide range of research, that endeavors to restore economics to its pr
Economics, Culture and Social Theory
Language: en
Pages: 281
Authors: William A. Jackson
Categories: Business & Economics
Type: BOOK - Published: 2009 - Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

. . . the book is excellent in setting out and explaining a fundamental critique of economics one moreover that has been missed by most other current critics of